Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f3ced/f3cedb69b934f7169f253825ad9ca28abd57cd22" alt="Olympus TG-320 front Olympus TG-320 front"
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2012
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly similar but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-320 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 II was released 3 years later than the TG-320 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-320 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M10 II scores against the TG-320 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-320
E-M10 II | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2012 | More recent by 45 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Olympus E-M10 II
TG-320 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-320
E-M10 II | TG-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you will need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II provides external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus TG-320 has measurements of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") with a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the TG-320.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3b150/3b1508ae7b3dfce17e747dc84f5207fd640879d7" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TG-320 is 82 and 94 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/195e1/195e16e662ff7646c67950c9f1697b1aa270ef12" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below should provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and TG-320.
As you can see, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will offer you greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will allow you to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II will have an edge in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd38b/bd38b3a8dc2d9f1b48790b2c41fa28285a9f982c" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/63cd7/63cd742a215a15adc7f1cad4bac0ea324bd20519" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus TG-320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus TG-320 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.1 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 5.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 150 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $499 | $0 |