Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
94 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview
Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-630 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 II was introduced 2 years later than the TG-630 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M10 II scores vs the TG-630 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus TG-630 iHS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus TG-630 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-M10 II | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | January 2013 | More recent by 32 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 II
TG-630 iHS | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-630 iHS
E-M10 II | TG-630 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II has got outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-630 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 II against the TG-630 iHS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and TG-630 iHS is 82 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The visual here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and TG-630 iHS.
As you can tell, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will resolve more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus TG-630 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus TG-630 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2013-01-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lbs) | 167 gr (0.37 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 220 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $499 | $200 |