Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Olympus TG-630 iHS front
Portability
94
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Revealed August 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus TG-630 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 167g - 98 x 66 x 22mm
  • Introduced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Overview

Below is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-630 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and they are both created by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and TG-630 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-630 iHS (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M10 II was introduced 2 years later than the TG-630 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-630 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the E-M10 II scores vs the TG-630 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-630 iHS

 E-M10 II TG-630 iHS 
IntroducedAugust 2015January 2013More recent by 32 months
Manually focus More precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k460kCrisper screen (+580k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-630 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 II

 TG-630 iHS E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-630 iHS

 E-M10 II TG-630 iHS 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen size
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Physical Comparison

For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II has got outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus TG-630 iHS has measurements of 98mm x 66mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-630 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 II against the TG-630 iHS.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and TG-630 iHS is 82 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Sensor Comparison

Typically, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor measurements simply by looking at technical specs. The visual here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and TG-630 iHS.

As you can tell, both the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will resolve more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II is going to have an edge in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Portrait photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
72
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with face detect autofocus
delivers RAW formats
27
comes with face detect autofocus
lack of manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography info
Olympus TG-630 iHS Street photography info
83
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
comes with focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
62
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no articulating screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Sports photography with Olympus TG-630 iHS
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking focus
no phase detect autofocus
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with tracking focus
environment proofing
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (220 per charge)
lacks phase detect autofocus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography factors
Olympus TG-630 iHS Travel photography factors
73
comes with focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
screen is not selfie friendly
59
environment proofing
flash built-in
rather wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
terrible battery (220 shots)
sensor resolution low (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography details
Olympus TG-630 iHS Landscape photography details
79
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
39
rather wide (28mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
no manual mode
sensor resolution low (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
terrible battery (220 shots)
no Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-630 iHS Vlogging factors
35
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detect autofocus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
no mic jack
33
rather wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 pxls)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-630 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-630 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIOlympus TG-630 iHS
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Olympus TG-630 iHS
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Revealed 2015-08-25 2013-01-08
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 25600 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 81 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focus range - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 8.0fps 5.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) -
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390 gr (0.86 lbs) 167 gr (0.37 lbs)
Dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 98 x 66 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photos 220 photos
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $499 $200