Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
37
Overall
36

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Introduced August 2015
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Announced February 2012
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview

Here is a extensive review of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The E-M10 II was launched 3 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-M10 II grades against the TG-820 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-M10 II TG-820 iHS 
AnnouncedAugust 2015February 2012Fresher by 44 months
Manual focus More accurate focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k1030kSharper screen (+10k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 II

 TG-820 iHS E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-820 iHS

 E-M10 II TG-820 iHS 
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen sizing
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the TG-820 iHS.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TG-820 iHS is 82 and 92 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison

More often than not, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and TG-820 iHS.

Plainly, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will offer more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography details
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography details
72
manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides face detection autofocus
exports RAW formats
27
includes face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual mode
no external flash support
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Street photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Street photography camera
83
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
comes with touch to focus
good ISO range (25,600)
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
screen is fixed
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography advice
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect autofocus
34
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
environment proofing
low frames per second (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery power (220 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography info
Olympus TG-820 iHS Travel photography info
73
comes with touch to focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
doesn't have selfie friendly display
59
environment proofing
has built in flash
quite wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
bad battery power (220 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
79
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
38
quite wide (28mm)
screen is a good size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
no manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
bad battery power (220 per charge)
no Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging advice
Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging advice
35
touchscreen enabled
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection autofocus
great video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
doesn't have external microphone jack
33
quite wide (28mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
sluggish max aperture (f3.9)
display is not selfie friendly
no mic jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-820 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIOlympus TG-820 iHS
General Information
Make Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Olympus TG-820 iHS
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Introduced 2015-08-25 2012-02-08
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VII TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-140mm (5.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.9-5.9
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Available lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Display resolution 1,040k dot 1,030k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology - HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames per sec 5.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO 100) 3.50 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 390 gr (0.86 pounds) 206 gr (0.45 pounds)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures 220 pictures
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots Single Single
Cost at launch $499 $500