Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Here is a extensive review of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are designed by Olympus. There exists a sizeable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") have different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 II was launched 3 years later than the TG-820 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-M10 II grades against the TG-820 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-M10 II | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | February 2012 | Fresher by 44 months | |
Manual focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1030k | Sharper screen (+10k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 II
TG-820 iHS | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-820 iHS
E-M10 II | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has specifications of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the TG-820 iHS.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TG-820 iHS is 82 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reading specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and TG-820 iHS.
Plainly, each of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will offer more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 1,030k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 220 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $499 | $500 |