Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Waterproof and both are offered by Olympus. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the TG-830 iHS (16MP) is pretty similar but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The E-M10 II was unveiled 2 years after the TG-830 iHS which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple overview of how the E-M10 II grades versus the TG-830 iHS in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Olympus TG-830 iHS. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-M10 II | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2013 | Newer by 32 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 II
TG-830 iHS | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-830 iHS
E-M10 II | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II features outer measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus TG-830 iHS has specifications of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the TG-830 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4aeae/4aeae2a26e9f79b2b200a1f7eed27e332be08ffa" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and TG-830 iHS is 82 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e422b/e422bc0081e93004a9c05839379a0989a0f281f6" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor dimensions only by reading technical specs. The pic below will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and TG-830 iHS.
As you can tell, both the cameras feature the identical megapixels albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II provides the bigger sensor which should make getting shallower depth of field easier. The younger E-M10 II is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/048ed/048ed8743131829ce8fbb90546ecb08b946e6d0d" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1bb8/f1bb817eef6e42ec3e21efa3671c4b69d2f60803" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-830 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus TG-830 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus TG-830 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2013-01-08 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) | 214 grams (0.47 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 300 images |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $499 | $0 |