Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63


91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.

The E-M10 II was unveiled 3 years after the TG-1 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the TG-1 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-M10 II | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | ![]() | May 2012 | More modern by 41 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 610k | Sharper display (+430k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 II
TG-1 iHS | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-M10 II | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 II against the TG-1 iHS.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TG-1 iHS is 82 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and TG-1 iHS.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will deliver greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 350 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $499 | $399 |