Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front
Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
40
Overall
37

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Launched August 2015
  • Old Model is Olympus E-M10
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus TG-1 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
  • Revealed May 2012
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview

Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The E-M10 II was unveiled 3 years after the TG-1 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the TG-1 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-1 iHS

 E-M10 II TG-1 iHS 
RevealedAugust 2015May 2012More modern by 41 months
Focus manually Dial accurate focus
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k610kSharper display (+430k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 II

 TG-1 iHS E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-1 iHS

 E-M10 II TG-1 iHS 
Display size3"3"Same display measurement
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 II against the TG-1 iHS.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TG-1 iHS is 82 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison

In many cases, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and TG-1 iHS.

All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will deliver greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Portrait photography camera
Olympus TG-1 iHS as a Portrait photography camera
72
you can focus manually
MP count good (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features face detection focusing
delivers RAW files
27
provides face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Street photography with Olympus TG-1 iHS
83
screen tilts up and down
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
supports touch to focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-1 iHS as a Sports photography camera
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect AF
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides tracking autofocus
environment proofing
great battery power (350 CIPA)
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography highlights
Olympus TG-1 iHS Travel photography highlights
73
supports touch to focus
MP count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
does not have a selfie friendly display
68
great battery power (350 per charge)
environment proofing
has built in flash
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
lack of Timelapse recording
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-1 iHS Landscape photography features
79
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW files
46
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
great battery power (350 CIPA)
manual focus not available
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
lack of manual exposure
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging factors
Olympus TG-1 iHS Vlogging factors
35
touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
does not have a selfie friendly display
no external microphone socket
36
pretty wide (25mm)
good max aperture (f2.0)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-1 iHS
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIOlympus Tough TG-1 iHS
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Waterproof
Launched 2015-08-25 2012-05-08
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII TruePic VI
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW support
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 81 -
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 25-100mm (4.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.0-4.9
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 1,040k dot 610k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 seconds 4 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) -
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual -
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390g (0.86 lb) 230g (0.51 lb)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photos 350 photos
Form of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 LI90B
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 and 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots Single Single
Launch price $499 $399