Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Overview
Following is a thorough assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-1 iHS, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof and both are manufactured by Olympus. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") have totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 II was unveiled 3 years after the TG-1 iHS which is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the TG-1 iHS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-M10 II | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | May 2012 | More modern by 41 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 610k | Sharper display (+430k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 II
TG-1 iHS | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-1 iHS
E-M10 II | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-1 iHS has specifications of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus TG-1 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 II against the TG-1 iHS.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TG-1 iHS is 82 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reviewing specs. The pic underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and TG-1 iHS.
All in all, each of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will deliver greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-1 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2012-05-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 350 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI90B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch price | $499 | $399 |