Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e50f/1e50fad8a32efe751efae0d6317d26784ad1ed5c" alt="Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front"
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both of them are built by Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M10 II was released 2 years later than the TG-2 iHS and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 II scores vs the TG-2 iHS in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M10 II | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | ![]() | June 2013 | More recent by 27 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 610k | Sharper screen (+430k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Olympus E-M10 II
TG-2 iHS | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-2 iHS
E-M10 II | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II has got outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus TG-2 iHS has dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II and the TG-2 iHS.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d27fa/d27fa6963da2933fd95b210bf995c85f821f3d82" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and TG-2 iHS is 82 and 91 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e77aa/e77aa392f6ac78c8b2332c8bf4c2b4d68fb4a518" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by reading through a spec sheet. The photograph here will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and TG-2 iHS.
Clearly, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II because of its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will resolve more detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3d09/d3d099265e85e5d88bc5678b61df962e06e12779" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/883c8/883c80dcfb7547d04c493d3fe53a1e08a99f7474" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-2 iHS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2013-06-28 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 610k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | - | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lb) | 230 gr (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 350 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | Li-90B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $499 | $380 |