Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc813/fc8134ea9f51e0bc25338134034432ddfb8d8548" alt="Olympus Tough TG-5 front Olympus Tough TG-5 front"
90 Imaging
38 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Boost to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 250g - 113 x 66 x 32mm
- Introduced May 2017
- Replaced the Olympus TG-4
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-6
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-5, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof and both are built by Olympus. There is a crucial difference among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and TG-5 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and TG-5 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M10 II was manufactured 21 months prior to the TG-5 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus TG-5 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the E-M10 II scores vs the TG-5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus Tough TG-5. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus TG-5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus TG-5
E-M10 II | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-5 over the Olympus E-M10 II
TG-5 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | May 2017 | ![]() | August 2015 | More recent by 21 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-5
E-M10 II | TG-5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II features outer measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Olympus TG-5 has dimensions of 113mm x 66mm x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus TG-5 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have attached at that moment. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II versus the TG-5.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/58eb6/58eb6e63a1332fa898c8c3bda887efeb147c70bb" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and TG-5 is 82 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45f29/45f29dd7b45d8a2ae1108fe867d7b66cc97181da" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specs. The graphic below might give you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and TG-5.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The older E-M10 II will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7989b/7989b66cb9d70da37368b096c1ab8ab495df8101" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db1d9/db1d97682c7bd7324a2d2a273fd31e33a5c233d4" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus TG-5 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Tough TG-5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus Tough TG-5 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2017-05-17 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 20.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lbs) | 250g (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 113 x 66 x 32mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 340 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I compatible) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $499 | $449 |