Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Olympus VG-110 front
Portability
97
Imaging
35
Features
20
Overall
29

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Launched August 2015
  • Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus VG-110
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
  • 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
  • Launched February 2011
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Overview

Here is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VG-110, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and VG-110 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and VG-110 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M10 II was manufactured 4 years later than the VG-110 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M10 II grades versus the VG-110 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus VG-110

 E-M10 II VG-110 
LaunchedAugust 2015February 2011Fresher by 56 months
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kClearer display (+810k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 VG-110 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VG-110

 E-M10 II VG-110 
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison

When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II offers outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus VG-110 has sizing of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).

See the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VG-110 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II vs the VG-110.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and VG-110 is 82 and 97 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing just by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and VG-110.

As you can see, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography info
Olympus VG-110 Portrait photography info
72
has manual focus
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes face detect focus
saves RAW formats
26
comes with face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography highlights
Olympus VG-110 Street photography highlights
83
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
supports touch to focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
48
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Sports photography camera
Olympus VG-110 as a Sports photography camera
67
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
includes tracking focus
has no phase detect auto focus
24
comes with tracking focus
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
bad battery power (170 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VG-110 as a Travel photography camera
73
supports touch to focus
good MP (16MP)
has built in flash
doesn't have selfie friendly display
57
built-in flash
rather wide (27mm)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
bad battery power (170 CIPA)
low resolution sensor (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography advice
Olympus VG-110 Landscape photography advice
79
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a good size (3")
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good MP (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
27
rather wide (27mm)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
screen is small (2.7")
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
low resolution sensor (12MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
bad battery power (170 CIPA)
doesn't have Timelapse recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 II
Vlogging with Olympus VG-110
35
has touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
includes face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't have selfie friendly display
does not have microphone port
28
rather wide (27mm)
comes with face detect autofocus
sluggish max aperture (f2.9)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 pixels)
doesn't have microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VG-110
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIOlympus VG-110
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Olympus VG-110
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Launched 2015-08-25 2011-02-08
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII TruePic III
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3968 x 2976
Max native ISO 25600 1600
Min native ISO 200 80
RAW format
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 27-108mm (4.0x)
Highest aperture - f/2.9-6.5
Macro focus range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen sizing 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 1,040k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 4 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 8.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Max video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390 grams (0.86 lbs) 105 grams (0.23 lbs)
Dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photos 170 photos
Battery format Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model BLS-50 LI-70B
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Launch cost $499 $150