Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/28610/28610d92a1bc9db50c39d8fc3686aeec0604eb40" alt="Olympus VG-110 front Olympus VG-110 front"
97 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F2.9-6.5) lens
- 105g - 92 x 54 x 20mm
- Launched February 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VG-110, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact and both of them are offered by Olympus. There exists a significant gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and VG-110 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and VG-110 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 II was manufactured 4 years later than the VG-110 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VG-110 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the E-M10 II grades versus the VG-110 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus VG-110. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus VG-110 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus VG-110
E-M10 II | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 56 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-110 over the Olympus E-M10 II
VG-110 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VG-110
E-M10 II | VG-110 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II offers outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus VG-110 has sizing of 92mm x 54mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 105 grams (0.23 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VG-110 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II vs the VG-110.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba875/ba875b82508bf2d0b2a9b271943e6cabf43d2f87" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and VG-110 is 82 and 97 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34f6b/34f6bbd4149793c358ebc658f0487d5c0cc1bed4" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing just by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here should offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and VG-110.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II featuring a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e86c/3e86ca883de4b121e67fd1ce35c5339b46921b51" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4c97/e4c972a2176258f118b88fdee8e7c2da31931e9c" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VG-110 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus VG-110 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus VG-110 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.9-6.5 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 4 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) | 105 grams (0.23 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 92 x 54 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 170 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $499 | $150 |