Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Olympus VH-515 front
Portability
95
Imaging
36
Features
34
Overall
35

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Revealed August 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
Olympus VH-515
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
  • Announced August 2012
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Overview

Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VH-515, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and VH-515 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and VH-515 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M10 II was revealed 3 years later than the VH-515 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.

Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M10 II scores vs the VH-515 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus VH-515

 E-M10 II VH-515 
AnnouncedAugust 2015August 2012Fresher by 37 months
Focus manually Dial precise focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k460kCrisper screen (+580k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 VH-515 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VH-515

 E-M10 II VH-515 
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II offers outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus VH-515 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VH-515 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 II against the VH-515.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and VH-515 is 82 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison

More often than not, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and VH-515.

As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will give you more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography highlights
Olympus VH-515 Portrait photography highlights
72
has manual focus
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
27
supports face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Street photography with Olympus VH-515
83
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
supports focus by touch
good high ISO (25,600)
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has focus via touch
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography advice
Olympus VH-515 Sports photography advice
67
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
lack of phase detect auto focus
32
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports tracking focus
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VH-515 as a Travel photography camera
73
supports focus by touch
decent MP (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
screen is not selfie friendly
62
has focus via touch
built-in flash
really wide (26mm)
no Timelapse recording
low megapixels (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus VH-515 as a Landscape photography camera
79
has manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
37
really wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
focusing manually not possible
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
no Timelapse recording
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging details
Olympus VH-515 Vlogging details
35
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
lack of external mic jack
35
really wide (26mm)
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no microphone support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VH-515
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIOlympus VH-515
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Olympus VH-515
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Compact
Revealed 2015-08-25 2012-08-21
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII TruePic III+
Sensor type CMOS BSI-CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 100
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-130mm (5.0x)
Maximal aperture - f/2.8-6.5
Macro focusing distance - 5cm
Total lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60s 4s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames/s 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO 100) 4.70 m
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 390 grams (0.86 lb) 152 grams (0.34 lb)
Dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photos -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 LI-50B
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $499 $648