Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Below, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VH-515, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and they are both manufactured by Olympus. There exists a significant gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and VH-515 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and VH-515 (1/2.3") use different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 II was revealed 3 years later than the VH-515 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M10 II scores vs the VH-515 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus VH-515. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus VH-515
E-M10 II | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | August 2012 | Fresher by 37 months | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Olympus E-M10 II
VH-515 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VH-515
E-M10 II | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II offers outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus VH-515 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VH-515 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 II against the VH-515.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and VH-515 is 82 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and VH-515.
As you have seen, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II using its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will give you more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus VH-515 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus VH-515 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2012-08-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 152 grams (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $499 | $648 |