Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VR-330
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus VR-330, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and both are produced by Olympus. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and VR-330 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M10 II was released 4 years after the VR-330 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before going right into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple summary of how the E-M10 II grades vs the VR-330 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Olympus VR-330
E-M10 II | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | February 2011 | More modern by 56 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus E-M10 II
VR-330 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Olympus VR-330
E-M10 II | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera, you should take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II versus Olympus VR-330 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 II vs the VR-330.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and VR-330 is 82 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to see the contrast in sensor sizes just by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and VR-330.
As you can see, the two cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II because of its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Olympus VR-330 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $499 | $220 |