Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a103/1a1032f1dfd06714b7350ef1b9a38b554f7326fa" alt="Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II front Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II front"
55 Imaging
54 Features
82 Overall
65
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Newer Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 808g - 136 x 97 x 132mm
- Announced February 2019
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Overview
The following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ1000 II, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the FZ1000 II (20MP) is relatively close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FZ1000 II (1") possess different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 II was manufactured 4 years prior to the FZ1000 II which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 II being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M10 II grades vs the FZ1000 II for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FZ1000 II
E-M10 II | FZ1000 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 II over the Olympus E-M10 II
FZ1000 II | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2019 | ![]() | August 2015 | Newer by 42 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 1240k | ![]() | 1040k | Sharper screen (+200k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ1000 II
E-M10 II | FZ1000 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to travel with your camera frequently, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 II has dimensions of 136mm x 97mm x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") and a weight of 808 grams (1.78 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ1000 II in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the FZ1000 II.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c27d/2c27de65e5132c2e03ff8f38db380248e8a0eaeb" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II size comparison"
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and FZ1000 II is 82 and 55 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10da3/10da3f2f632f24383c72c63610deacff8e79344b" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by researching specs. The pic underneath might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and FZ1000 II.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II because of its bigger sensor is going to make getting bokeh less difficult and the Panasonic FZ1000 II will result in greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-M10 II will be behind in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dbb75/dbb75749332ab3bdb5f96301a2c8e3907caad78f" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/79c39/79c39a5603440f81cb6d0e5ceb78a4da6425e5f8" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ1000 II Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DC-FZ1000 II |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2019-02-18 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 1,240 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 13.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off, 1st / 2nd Slow Sync. |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 808 gr (1.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 136 x 97 x 132mm (5.4" x 3.8" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 350 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-I supported) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $499 | $898 |