Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FH1
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FH1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 163g - 98 x 55 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FS10
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FH1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic FH1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and FH1 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FH1 (1/2.3") come with different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M10 II was brought out 5 years later than the FH1 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the FH1 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FH1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic FH1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FH1
E-M10 II | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | January 2010 | More recent by 69 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH1 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FH1 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FH1
E-M10 II | FH1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FH1 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic FH1 has sizing of 98mm x 55mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 163 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II versus Panasonic FH1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Following is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 II vs the FH1.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and FH1 is 82 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FH1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading through specs. The photograph below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and FH1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II because of its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will give greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FH1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FH1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH1 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FS10 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-6.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 6.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lbs) | 163 gr (0.36 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 98 x 55 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $499 | $150 |