Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP1
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 151g - 99 x 59 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2010
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP1 Overview
Let's examine more closely at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP1, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and FP1 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FP1 (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M10 II was announced 5 years after the FP1 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FP1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the E-M10 II grades versus the FP1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Panasonic FP1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FP1
E-M10 II | FP1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | January 2010 | More modern by 69 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FP1 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FP1 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FP1
E-M10 II | FP1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II has outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic FP1 has sizing of 99mm x 59mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") along with a weight of 151 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II against the FP1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and FP1 is 82 and 95 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP1 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes just by looking at technical specs. The image here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and FP1.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FP1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FP1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.90 m (Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lb) | 151 gr (0.33 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 99 x 59 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $499 | $153 |