Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ150
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
67 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8-5.2) lens
- 528g - 124 x 82 x 92mm
- Launched April 2012
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ150, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and FZ150 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FZ150 (1/2.3") possess different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 II was manufactured 3 years later than the FZ150 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ150 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the FZ150 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Panasonic FZ150 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FZ150
E-M10 II | FZ150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | April 2012 | Fresher by 42 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper display (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ150 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FZ150 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating display | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ150
E-M10 II | FZ150 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with outside measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ150 has dimensions of 124mm x 82mm x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") and a weight of 528 grams (1.16 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ150 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II against the FZ150.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and FZ150 is 82 and 67 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and FZ150.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II featuring a larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will show extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ150 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ150 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2012-04-11 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.2 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 9.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lb) | 528 gr (1.16 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 124 x 82 x 92mm (4.9" x 3.2" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 19.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 10.9 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 132 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 410 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $499 | $499 |