Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 front
Portability
65
Imaging
36
Features
64
Overall
47

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Launched August 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
Panasonic FZ200
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
  • Launched July 2012
  • Old Model is Panasonic FZ100
  • Updated by Panasonic FZ300
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview

Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The E-M10 II was introduced 3 years after the FZ200 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the FZ200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FZ200

 E-M10 II FZ200 
LaunchedAugust 2015July 2012More modern by 38 months
Screen resolution1040k460kCrisper screen (+580k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 FZ200 E-M10 II 
Screen typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating screen
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ200

 E-M10 II FZ200 
Manually focus More accurate focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen size

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison

When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II features exterior measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the FZ200.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and FZ200 is 82 and 65 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and FZ200.

As you can see, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography information
Panasonic FZ200 Portrait photography information
72
has manual focus
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides face detect focus
delivers RAW formats
48
focusing manually
high flash sync speed (1/4,000 seconds)
comes with face detect autofocus
exports RAW formats
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography information
Panasonic FZ200 Street photography information
83
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW formats
includes touch to focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
57
screen can move to multiple angles
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
heavier than competition (588g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic FZ200 as a Sports photography camera
67
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
provides tracking focus
lacks phase detect auto focus
46
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with tracking focus
better than average battery power (540 per charge)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography factors
Panasonic FZ200 Travel photography factors
73
includes touch to focus
resolution is good (16MP)
built-in flash
display is not selfie friendly
55
better than average battery power (540 shots)
has built in flash
selfie friendly screen
fairly wide (25mm)
great reach (600mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
heavier than competition (588g)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography info
Panasonic FZ200 Landscape photography info
79
has manual focus
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
resolution is good (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW formats
48
focusing manually
fairly wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
better than average battery power (540 shots)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
lack of Time Lapse function
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging factors
Panasonic FZ200 Vlogging factors
35
touch screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic socket
63
fairly wide (25mm)
selfie friendly screen
image stabilization (Optical)
comes with face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
has mic socket
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competition (588g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ200
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
General Information
Company Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2015-08-25 2012-07-18
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII Venus Engine VII FHD
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Live view autofocus
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 81 23
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8
Macro focusing distance - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fully Articulated
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 1,040k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display technology - Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 1,312k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 60s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames per second 12.0 frames per second
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO 100) 13.50 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/4000s
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1920x1080
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 390g (0.86 lbs) 588g (1.30 lbs)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 37
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 19.1
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 10.8
DXO Low light rating 842 114
Other
Battery life 320 shots 540 shots
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Retail pricing $499 $499