Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
65 Imaging
35 Features
64 Overall
46
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Push to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
- 588g - 125 x 87 x 110mm
- Launched July 2012
- Old Model is Panasonic FZ100
- Updated by Panasonic FZ300
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and FZ200 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FZ200 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M10 II was introduced 3 years after the FZ200 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the FZ200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic FZ200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FZ200
| E-M10 II | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2015 | July 2012 | More modern by 38 months | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Crisper screen (+580k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ200 over the Olympus E-M10 II
| FZ200 | E-M10 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ200
| E-M10 II | FZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II features exterior measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ200 has specifications of 125mm x 87mm x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") and a weight of 588 grams (1.30 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at the time. The following is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the FZ200.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and FZ200 is 82 and 65 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes only by researching a spec sheet. The pic here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and FZ200.
As you can see, the two cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ200 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ200 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2012-07-18 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine VII FHD |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | 81 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | - | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | - | Free-Angle TFT Screen LCD Display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 1,312k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | 12.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 13.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/4000s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 50, 30, 25 fps), 640 x 480 (240, 120, 30, 25 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 390g (0.86 lbs) | 588g (1.30 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 125 x 87 x 110mm (4.9" x 3.4" x 4.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | 73 | 37 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 19.1 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 10.8 |
| DXO Low light rating | 842 | 114 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | 540 shots |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail pricing | $499 | $499 |