Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cdd51/cdd51cf2d542515b3ba6c6c81eb98dc3a189d634" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 front"
53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Revealed September 2016
- Alternative Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Superseded the Panasonic FZ1000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ2500, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the FZ2500 (20MP) is relatively well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FZ2500 (1") possess different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The E-M10 II was announced 13 months prior to the FZ2500 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summation of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the FZ2500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FZ2500
E-M10 II | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FZ2500 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2016 | ![]() | August 2015 | More modern by 13 months |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ2500
E-M10 II | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1040k | Same screen resolution |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers physical dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ2500 has dimensions of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") along with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ2500 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that moment. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the FZ2500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9869/a986953ef7aca0d37d01804c3a866dc12dd62adb" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and FZ2500 is 82 and 53 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26ab5/26ab59adebaa9d10590af498e6a5a934ed0eed4d" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and FZ2500.
As you can see, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II with its bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Panasonic FZ2500 will give more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more aged E-M10 II is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c785b/c785b7d0d005499db7a0da257ba5cb6149ea8afa" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ae81/3ae81aad307f2358c59742fe4d9749405e754132" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,040 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lbs) | 915g (2.02 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 350 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $499 | $998 |