Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ300

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300 front
Portability
59
Imaging
37
Features
73
Overall
51

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Announced August 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10
  • Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
Panasonic FZ300
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1/16000s Max Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 25-600mm (F2.8) lens
  • 691g - 132 x 92 x 117mm
  • Released July 2015
  • Old Model is Panasonic FZ200
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Overview

Lets look more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ300, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and FZ300 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FZ300 (1/2.3") have totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 II was launched 2 months after the FZ300 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ300 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 II scores against the FZ300 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FZ300

 E-M10 II FZ300 

Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ300 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 FZ300 E-M10 II 
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ300

 E-M10 II FZ300 
ReleasedAugust 2015July 2015Same generation
Manual focus Dial exact focusing
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Display resolution1040k1040kExact same display resolution
Touch display Easily navigate

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II has got outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ300 has measurements of 132mm x 92mm x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6") and a weight of 691 grams (1.52 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ300 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II and the FZ300.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ300 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and FZ300 is 82 and 59 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it's hard to see the gap in sensor sizes simply by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath will provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and FZ300.

As you can tell, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II due to its larger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics way more aggressively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Portrait photography with Panasonic FZ300
72
has manual focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features face detection focus
supports RAW formats
46
has manual focus
features face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography information
Panasonic FZ300 Street photography information
83
screen tilts
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
supports RAW formats
supports focus via touch
above average ISO range (25,600)
59
screen articulates fully
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
supports focus via touch
environment sealing
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
heavier than competitors (691g)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography highlights
Panasonic FZ300 Sports photography highlights
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
features tracking autofocus
does not have phase detect auto focus
51
long zoom range (25-600mm 24.0 x zoom)
high shutter speed (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Optical)
features tracking focus
environment sealing
good battery pack (380 CIPA)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Travel photography with Panasonic FZ300
73
supports focus via touch
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
does not posses selfie friendly screen
59
good battery pack (380 per charge)
environment sealing
supports focus via touch
flash built-in
screen is selfie friendly
pretty wide (25mm)
long reach (600mm)
heavier than competitors (691 grams)
MP count low (12MP)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography factors
Panasonic FZ300 Landscape photography factors
79
has manual focus
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
supports RAW formats
52
has manual focus
pretty wide (25mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
supports RAW formats
environment sealing
good battery pack (380 shots)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging info
Panasonic FZ300 Vlogging info
35
touchscreen functionality
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
features face detection focus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
does not posses selfie friendly screen
no external microphone socket
62
pretty wide (25mm)
screen is selfie friendly
touchscreen capability
image stabilization (Optical)
features face detect autofocus
high quality video (3840 x 2160 pxls)
comes with mic support
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
heavier than competitors (691g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ300
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIPanasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Panasonic
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ300
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2015-08-25 2015-07-16
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Processor Chip TruePic VII Venus Engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW data
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Total focus points 81 49
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 25-600mm (24.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Total lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fully Articulated
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040k dots 1,040k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots 1,440k dots
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Min shutter speed 60 seconds 60 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 8.0 frames per sec 12.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO 100) 8.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on w/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction, forced off
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 390 grams (0.86 lbs) 691 grams (1.52 lbs)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 132 x 92 x 117mm (5.2" x 3.6" x 4.6")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures 380 pictures
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Card slots Single Single
Launch cost $499 $598