Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ35
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63


72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ35, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and FZ35 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and FZ35 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.

The E-M10 II was unveiled 5 years later than the FZ35 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the E-M10 II scores vs the FZ35 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic FZ35
E-M10 II | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | ![]() | July 2010 | Fresher by 63 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus E-M10 II
FZ35 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic FZ35
E-M10 II | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focus | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has dimensions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ35 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II vs the FZ35.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and FZ35 is 82 and 72 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through technical specs. The graphic underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and FZ35.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II with its larger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos way more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2010-07-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 8.50 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lbs) | 397g (0.88 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $499 | $999 |