Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic GH4
Portability
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Portability
66 Imaging
53 Features
88 Overall
67
66 Imaging
53 Features
88 Overall
67
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic GH4 Key Specs
Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
Panasonic GH4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 560g - 133 x 93 x 84mm
- Revealed February 2014
- Replaced the Panasonic GH3
- Renewed by Panasonic GH5
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic GH4 Overview
The following is a comprehensive review of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic GH4, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Pro Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the GH4 (16MP) is relatively similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (Four Thirds).
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe E-M10 II was released 19 months after the GH4 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M10 II grades against the GH4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic GH4 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic GH4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic GH4
| E-M10 II | GH4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2015 |  | February 2014 | Newer by 19 months |
| Screen resolution | 1040k |  | 1036k | Clearer screen (+4k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GH4 over the Olympus E-M10 II
| GH4 | E-M10 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic GH4
| E-M10 II | GH4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic GH4 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II has got physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GH4 has specifications of 133mm x 93mm x 84mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 3.3") with a weight of 560 grams (1.23 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic GH4 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the GH4.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and GH4 is 82 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic GH4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specifications. The image underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and GH4.
To sum up, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution therefore you can expect similar quality of photographs though you would want to factor the age of the products into consideration. The more recent E-M10 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic GH4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Portrait photography with Panasonic GH4
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focusing
saves RAW formats
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II Street photography information
Panasonic GH4 Street photography information
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
comes with focus by touch
great ISO range (25,600)
fully articulated screen
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
comes with focus by touch
environment proofing
lighter than competitors in class (560 grams)
above average ISO range (25,600)
lack of image stabilization
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic GH4 as a Sports photography camera
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
has no phase detect AF
max shutter speed is good (1/8,000s)
good resolution (16MP)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
environment proofing
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II as a Travel photography camera
Panasonic GH4 as a Travel photography camera
comes with focus by touch
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
flash built-in
screen is not selfie friendly
lighter than competitors in class (560 grams)
environment proofing
comes with focus by touch
good resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
display is selfie friendly
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography info
Panasonic GH4 Landscape photography info
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
great ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW formats
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
environment proofing
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic GH4 as a Vlogging camera
touchscreen functionality
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have external mic support
display is selfie friendly
built-in touchscreen
supports face detection autofocus
high res video (4096 x 2160 pixels)
does have external microphone socket
lighter than competitors in class (560 grams)
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic GH4 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 |
| Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Pro Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2014-02-07 |
| Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | Venus Engine IX |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | Four Thirds |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 49 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Micro Four Thirds |
| Amount of lenses | 107 | 107 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Tilting | Fully Articulated |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 1,036k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | - | OLED |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,359k dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.67x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 12.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 17.00 m (at ISO 200) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, auto/redeye reduction, forced on, forced on/redeye reduction, slow sync, slow sync/redeye reduction, forced off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/250 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2160 (24p), 3840 x 2160 (24p, 25p, 30p), 1920 x 1080 (24p, 25p, 30p, 50p, 60p), 1280 x 720 (24p, 25p, 30p), 640 x 480 (25p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 560 gr (1.23 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 133 x 93 x 84mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 3.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | 73 | 74 |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 23.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 12.8 |
| DXO Low light score | 842 | 791 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 images | 500 images |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | DMW-BLF19 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs (single or three-shot)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $499 | $1,500 |