Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
![Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-II/Olympus-E-M10-II-front.jpg)
![Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-S1/Panasonic-S1-front.jpg)
96 Imaging
35 Features
21 Overall
29
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 117g - 99 x 59 x 21mm
- Announced January 2011
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic S1, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and S1 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and S1 (1/2.3") posses different sensor measurements.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The E-M10 II was released 4 years later than the S1 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic S1 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a complete comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the S1 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic S1
E-M10 II | S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2011 | Fresher by 57 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic S1 over the Olympus E-M10 II
S1 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic S1
E-M10 II | S1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers exterior dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic S1 has measurements of 99mm x 59mm x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 117 grams (0.26 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic S1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you select during that time. Below is a front view scale comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the S1.
![Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-II-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-S1-size-comparison.jpg)
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and S1 is 82 and 96 respectively.
![Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-II-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-S1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing simply by seeing a spec sheet. The photograph below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and S1.
As you can see, both of these cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
![Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-II-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-S1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 Screen and ViewFinder
![Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Olympus-OM-D-E-M10-II-vs-Panasonic-Lumix-DMC-S1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic S1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-S1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2011-01-05 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.1-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 3.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 pounds) | 117g (0.26 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 99 x 59 x 21mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 240 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $499 | $269 |