Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR1
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
94 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 158g - 98 x 55 x 26mm
- Launched July 2009
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-ZX1
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Overview
Below is a thorough review of the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZR1, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and ZR1 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and ZR1 (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M10 II was unveiled 6 years later than the ZR1 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZR1 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the ZR1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Panasonic ZR1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic ZR1
E-M10 II | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | July 2009 | More recent by 74 months | |
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZR1 over the Olympus E-M10 II
ZR1 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZR1
E-M10 II | ZR1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II has got physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Panasonic ZR1 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZR1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 II and the ZR1.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and ZR1 is 82 and 94 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to see the gap in sensor measurements just by looking through a spec sheet. The photograph here may give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and ZR1.
Clearly, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II having a larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will result in greater detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a little more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZR1 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZR1 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-ZX1 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2009-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 25-200mm (8.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 5.10 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 158 grams (0.35 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 98 x 55 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $499 | $280 |