Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS15
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Launched June 2012
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Refreshed by Panasonic ZS20
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Overview
Following is a extensive assessment of the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZS15, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and ZS15 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and ZS15 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M10 II was launched 3 years after the ZS15 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic ZS15 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise view of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the ZS15 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Panasonic ZS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Panasonic ZS15
E-M10 II | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | June 2012 | More modern by 39 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS15 over the Olympus E-M10 II
ZS15 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZS15
E-M10 II | ZS15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II provides physical dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Panasonic ZS15 has sizing of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Examine the Olympus E-M10 II and Panasonic ZS15 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the E-M10 II and the ZS15.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and ZS15 is 82 and 92 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading through a spec sheet. The image below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and ZS15.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II because of its larger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will give you greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2012-06-29 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 15 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 6.40 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 208g (0.46 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 260 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $499 | $279 |