Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax Efina
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
97 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax Efina Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
- Launched June 2013
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax Efina Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax Efina, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the Efina (14MP) is pretty comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and Efina (1/2.3") come with totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 II was manufactured 2 years later than the Efina and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax Efina being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summary of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the Efina with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax Efina Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Pentax Efina. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Pentax Efina Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Pentax Efina
E-M10 II | Efina | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | June 2013 | Fresher by 28 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax Efina over the Olympus E-M10 II
Efina | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax Efina
E-M10 II | Efina | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax Efina Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with external measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Pentax Efina has dimensions of 87mm x 54mm x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 91 grams (0.20 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax Efina in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use during that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 II vs the Efina.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and Efina is 82 and 97 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax Efina Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing merely by going through a spec sheet. The photograph below will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and Efina.
Clearly, both of those cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II due to its bigger sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will show extra detail due to its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax Efina Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax Efina Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax Efina | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax Efina |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2013-06-03 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 20cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 4.10 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lb) | 91 gr (0.20 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 200 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | D-LI109 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch price | $499 | $10 |