Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7664a/7664a04951cdb8a34b9dfe4c6285125ada24205c" alt="Pentax K-500 front Pentax K-500 front"
64 Imaging
58 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Released November 2013
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Here is a detailed review of the Olympus E-M10 II versus Pentax K-500, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the K-500 (16MP) is relatively well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and K-500 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The E-M10 II was announced 22 months later than the K-500 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a concise summation of how the E-M10 II grades against the K-500 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Pentax K-500. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Pentax K-500
E-M10 II | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | ![]() | November 2013 | Fresher by 22 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Crisper screen (+119k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus E-M10 II
K-500 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax K-500
E-M10 II | K-500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Pentax K-500 has dimensions of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") with a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II versus Pentax K-500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II versus the K-500.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05d8a/05d8a9f6697f4a04c153e6f9454f0cbea857bc40" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and K-500 is 82 and 64 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85716/857164a502aae2b7be2dc7a817870af11210e79f" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be difficult to imagine the gap between sensor sizing only by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and K-500.
As you have seen, both of these cameras posses the exact same megapixel count albeit different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II includes the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow depth of field harder. The more recent E-M10 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/526cd/526cd5cc6e416fbd677f2353a6af81608ac12725" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0aa20/0aa209125d9315d035a8b22ff8cb955ca5039119" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax K-500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax K-500 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2013-11-27 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | PRIME M |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 51600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.61x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/6000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 pounds) | 646g (1.42 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | 79 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 13.1 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 1087 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | 710 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | AA |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $499 | $600 |