Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2813a/2813afe340c3e203bd6902c7b27645af6433fc86" alt="Pentax K-r front Pentax K-r front"
67 Imaging
53 Features
52 Overall
52
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Announced August 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1280 x 720 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 598g - 125 x 97 x 68mm
- Launched March 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and K-r (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and K-r (APS-C) use totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M10 II was brought out 4 years later than the K-r and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K-r being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving through a in depth comparison, below is a brief summation of how the E-M10 II scores vs the K-r with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Pentax K-r. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Pentax K-r Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Pentax K-r
E-M10 II | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | ![]() | March 2011 | Fresher by 55 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 921k | Clearer display (+119k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K-r over the Olympus E-M10 II
K-r | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax K-r
E-M10 II | K-r | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II features outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Pentax K-r has dimensions of 125mm x 97mm x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") and a weight of 598 grams (1.32 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 II vs the K-r.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c9aaa/c9aaa5e03c212b58ef5d58f5b9bf8ad2b9d9c3db" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and K-r is 82 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ae3a/5ae3af469d300905cdecbf08dae8c73eb7a13ddf" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing simply by going over technical specs. The visual below might offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and K-r.
As you can tell, the two cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Olympus E-M10 II will deliver greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74394/7439413147e778073f02c049b2d72c577a2f486a" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/34018/340181a3c8547083f154190cf87ba1bbd8ac6d35" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K-r Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax K-r | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax K-r |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2015-08-25 | 2011-03-11 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | Prime II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 372.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Cross focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | - | TFT LCD monitor |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync, High-Speed Sync and Wireless Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 pounds) | 598 grams (1.32 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 125 x 97 x 68mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | 72 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 22.9 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 12.4 |
DXO Low light score | 842 | 755 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 470 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | D-LI109,4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at release | $499 | $1,100 |