Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b26ee/b26ee354c3adaf0307bfc7498c215c4050aaeba0" alt="Pentax K110D front Pentax K110D front"
67 Imaging
44 Features
30 Overall
38
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 585g - 129 x 93 x 70mm
- Launched May 2006
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax K110D, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Olympus and Pentax. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and K110D (6MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and K110D (APS-C) have totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The E-M10 II was manufactured 9 years later than the K110D and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K110D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the E-M10 II grades against the K110D for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Pentax K110D. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Pentax K110D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Pentax K110D
E-M10 II | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | ![]() | May 2006 | Fresher by 113 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 210k | Clearer display (+830k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K110D over the Olympus E-M10 II
K110D | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax K110D
E-M10 II | K110D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera often, you have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II features outer measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Pentax K110D has dimensions of 129mm x 93mm x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") with a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax K110D in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 II and the K110D.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bec0/2bec0cc771cc7e643def4656e80f2e18499dc1e3" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and K110D is 82 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2fc9/b2fc98f1ec509bf8dc1138892a3c2dbd5db73b93" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be difficult to envision the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specifications. The graphic underneath should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and K110D.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II due to its tinier sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus E-M10 II will deliver greater detail due to its extra 10 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bbee/8bbee20c913325af1f69fd0a7ba26d99798f0b1d" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f53ea/f53eaee4b08331f4713177e89d9d86c5e13d96dc" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K110D Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax K110D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax K110D |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2006-05-22 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF |
Number of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 210k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 lbs) | 585 gr (1.29 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 129 x 93 x 70mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $499 | $1,000 |