Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K200D
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
61 Imaging
50 Features
41 Overall
46
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Revealed September 2008
- Replaced the Pentax K100D S
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K200D Overview
The following is a extensive review of the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax K200D, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and K200D (10MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and K200D (APS-C) posses different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe E-M10 II was announced 7 years after the K200D which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M10 II scores vs the K200D in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K200D Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Pentax K200D. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Pentax K200D
E-M10 II | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | September 2008 | Newer by 85 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer display (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Olympus E-M10 II
K200D | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax K200D
E-M10 II | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II provides physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Pentax K200D has measurements of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") accompanied by a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax K200D in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the K200D.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and K200D is 82 and 61 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The pic underneath may give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and K200D.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II using its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field harder and the Olympus E-M10 II will render extra detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax K200D |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2008-09-01 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3872 x 2592 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Pentax KAF2 |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 151 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lbs) | 690g (1.52 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | 842 | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $499 | $600 |