Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
93 Imaging
37 Features
31 Overall
34
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 167g - 116 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2011
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Pentax WG-1 GPS, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the WG-1 GPS (14MP) is very well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and WG-1 GPS (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M10 II was brought out 4 years later than the WG-1 GPS and that is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax WG-1 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief summary of how the E-M10 II scores versus the WG-1 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Pentax WG-1 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-M10 II | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | August 2011 | More recent by 49 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-1 GPS over the Olympus E-M10 II
WG-1 GPS | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Pentax WG-1 GPS
E-M10 II | WG-1 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Physical Comparison
When you are planning to lug around your camera, you're going to have to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers outer measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Pentax WG-1 GPS has measurements of 116mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II versus Pentax WG-1 GPS in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the WG-1 GPS.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and WG-1 GPS is 82 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The graphic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and WG-1 GPS.
All in all, both of the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II due to its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will resolve extra detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images a little more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II will have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Pentax WG-1 GPS Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Pentax Optio WG-1 GPS |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2011-08-16 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD with Anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 3.90 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 pounds) | 167g (0.37 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 116 x 59 x 29mm (4.6" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 260 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $499 | $350 |