Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh CX2

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
77
Overall
62
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Ricoh CX2 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Released August 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh CX2 Overview

On this page, we will be matching up the Olympus E-M10 II versus Ricoh CX2, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and CX2 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The E-M10 II was released 6 years after the CX2 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.

Before we go straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick overview of how the E-M10 II scores vs the CX2 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Ricoh CX2

 E-M10 II CX2 
LaunchedAugust 2015August 2009More modern by 74 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k920kCrisper screen (+120k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 CX2 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Ricoh CX2

 E-M10 II CX2 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Screen dimensions3"3"Equal screen measurement
Selfie screen Neither comes with selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison

For those who are planning to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with outer measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).

Check the Olympus E-M10 II versus Ricoh CX2 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II and the CX2.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and CX2 is 82 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it's hard to envision the difference between sensor sizes simply by reviewing specs. The image here will give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and CX2.

As you can plainly see, both cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II due to its bigger sensor will make achieving bokeh simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will deliver more detail as a result of its extra 7MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II will have a benefit in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh CX2 Portrait photography highlights
71
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has face detection autofocus
saves RAW files
25
you can focus manually
no manual control
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Street photography camera
Ricoh CX2 as a Street photography camera
82
tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
includes focus by touch
very good ISO range (25,600)
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (185 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Sports photography with Ricoh CX2
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
has tracking autofocus
has no phase detect autofocus
26
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
no shutter priority mode
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh CX2 as a Travel photography camera
73
includes focus by touch
decent sensor resolution (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
screen isn't selfie friendly
66
lighter than competition in class (185g)
built-in flash
quite wide (28mm)
long zoom (300mm)
resolution not great (9 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography advice
Ricoh CX2 Landscape photography advice
79
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
decent sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
sensor size is decent (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
42
you can focus manually
quite wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
resolution not great (9MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging information
Ricoh CX2 Vlogging information
35
touchscreen enabled
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
has face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
screen isn't selfie friendly
does not have external mic port
30
quite wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (185g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.5)
display isn't selfie friendly
low video resolution (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Ricoh CX2
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IIRicoh CX2
General Information
Brand Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Ricoh CX2
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2015-08-25 2009-08-20
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless Compact
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 9 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Lowest native ISO 200 80
RAW files
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 28-300mm (10.7x)
Maximal aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focus range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3" 3"
Resolution of display 1,040k dots 920k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 8.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes -
Change WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) 3.00 m (ISO 400)
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390 gr (0.86 pounds) 185 gr (0.41 pounds)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 DB-70
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $499 $341