Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh G900
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62


89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh G900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 247g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Introduced February 2018

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh G900 Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh G900, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Waterproof by companies Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the G900 (20MP) is pretty close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and G900 (1/2.3") offer totally different sensor size.

The E-M10 II was revealed 3 years before the G900 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh G900 being a Compact camera.
Before diving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the G900 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh G900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Ricoh G900. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Ricoh G900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Ricoh G900
E-M10 II | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh G900 over the Olympus E-M10 II
G900 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2018 | ![]() | August 2015 | Fresher by 30 months |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Ricoh G900
E-M10 II | G900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen size |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 1040k | Exact same screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh G900 Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II has outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Ricoh G900 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh G900 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the G900.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and G900 is 82 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh G900 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing only by researching a spec sheet. The graphic here should give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and G900.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Ricoh G900 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs more aggressively. The older E-M10 II will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh G900 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh G900 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Ricoh G900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Ricoh G900 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Waterproof |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2018-02-21 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 125 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Number of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames per second | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Flash on, flash off |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840x2160 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
GPS | None | Built-in |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 247g (0.54 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 340 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $499 | $752 |