Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Revealed February 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former is a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) is pretty close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 II was brought out 3 years after the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the E-M10 II grades vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| E-M10 II | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2015 | February 2012 | Newer by 44 months | |
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen resolution | 1040k | 920k | Crisper screen (+120k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus E-M10 II
| GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | E-M10 II |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| E-M10 II | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
If you're going to travel with your camera often, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II provides outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has sizing of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. The following is a front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 82 and 69 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions only by researching specifications. The pic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
To sum up, each of these cameras have the same megapixels albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II features the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallow DOF harder. The fresher E-M10 II is going to have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus E-M10 II vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
| Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2012-02-02 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 200 | 200 |
| RAW images | ||
| Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Total lenses | 107 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 550g (1.21 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 shots | 400 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $499 | $871 |