Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung CL80
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62


95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Other Name is ST5500

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung CL80 Overview
Below is a complete overview of the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung CL80, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is relatively similar but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and CL80 (1/2.3") provide different sensor sizes.

The E-M10 II was released 5 years later than the CL80 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the CL80 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Samsung CL80. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung CL80
E-M10 II | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | ![]() | January 2010 | More recent by 69 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Olympus E-M10 II
CL80 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.7" | ![]() | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.7") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung CL80
E-M10 II | CL80 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL80 has dimensions of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung CL80 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II versus the CL80.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and CL80 is 82 and 95 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The photograph here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and CL80.
As you can tell, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus E-M10 II will offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II should have a benefit in sensor innovation.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung CL80 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung CL80 |
Also referred to as | - | ST5500 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2010-01-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4334 x 3256 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 4800 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
Maximal aperture | - | f/3.3-5.5 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Available lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 160g (0.35 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $499 | $400 |