Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung Galaxy NX
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
82 Imaging
62 Features
76 Overall
67
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung Galaxy NX Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 4.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 495g - 137 x 101 x 26mm
- Released June 2013
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung Galaxy NX Overview
Below, we are comparing the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung Galaxy NX, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the Galaxy NX (20MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and Galaxy NX (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 II was revealed 2 years after the Galaxy NX which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (SLR-style mirrorless).
Before diving straight into a thorough comparison, below is a simple highlight of how the E-M10 II scores against the Galaxy NX with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung Galaxy NX Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Samsung Galaxy NX. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Samsung Galaxy NX Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung Galaxy NX
E-M10 II | Galaxy NX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | June 2013 | Newer by 27 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 922k | Clearer display (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung Galaxy NX over the Olympus E-M10 II
Galaxy NX | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 4.8" | 3" | Larger display (+1.8") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung Galaxy NX
E-M10 II | Galaxy NX | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung Galaxy NX Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus E-M10 II has external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung Galaxy NX has sizing of 137mm x 101mm x 26mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 1.0") having a weight of 495 grams (1.09 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung Galaxy NX in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 II vs the Galaxy NX.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and Galaxy NX is 82 and 82 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung Galaxy NX Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be hard to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing technical specs. The picture underneath should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and Galaxy NX.
As you can tell, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II using its smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung Galaxy NX will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images much more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung Galaxy NX Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung Galaxy NX Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung Galaxy NX | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung Galaxy NX |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2013-06-20 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 4.8 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dots | 922 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display tech | - | HD TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) | 495 grams (1.09 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 137 x 101 x 26mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 440 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $499 | $1,300 |