Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ30W
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
- Other Name is WB600
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ30W, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and HZ30W (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and HZ30W (1/2.3") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe E-M10 II was brought out 5 years later than the HZ30W and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ30W being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a in depth comparison, below is a quick view of how the E-M10 II grades versus the HZ30W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Samsung HZ30W. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung HZ30W
E-M10 II | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | January 2010 | Fresher by 69 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 230k | Clearer screen (+810k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Olympus E-M10 II
HZ30W | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung HZ30W
E-M10 II | HZ30W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera often, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II has outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung HZ30W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ30W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you select at that time. Here is the front view size comparison of the E-M10 II against the HZ30W.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and HZ30W is 82 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to picture the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and HZ30W.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will offer greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung HZ30W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung HZ30W |
Also called | - | WB600 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2010-01-19 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 3cm |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lbs) | 245g (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $499 | $280 |