Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
77
Overall
62
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Samsung HZ50W front
Portability
70
Imaging
36
Features
44
Overall
39

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Introduced August 2015
  • Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Samsung HZ50W
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
  • 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
  • Released May 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB5500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Overview

Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung HZ50W, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is relatively close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and HZ50W (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 II was launched 5 years later than the HZ50W and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M10 II matches up against the HZ50W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung HZ50W

 E-M10 II HZ50W 
ReleasedAugust 2015May 2010Fresher by 65 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k230kSharper screen (+810k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus E-M10 II

 HZ50W E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung HZ50W

 E-M10 II HZ50W 
Manually focus Very precise focusing
Screen size3"3"Same screen measurements
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys exterior dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung HZ50W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 II and the HZ50W.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and HZ50W is 82 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through specifications. The visual below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and HZ50W.

Plainly, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography information
Samsung HZ50W Portrait photography information
71
focusing manually
good resolution (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detection focus
supports RAW files
45
you can focus manually
MP count decent (14MP)
exports RAW formats
cannot use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Street photography camera
Samsung HZ50W as a Street photography camera
82
screen tilts up and down
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
features touch to focus
above average high ISO (25,600)
55
built in image stabilization (Optical)
exports RAW formats
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Sports photography with Samsung HZ50W
66
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking autofocus
no phase detect auto focus
48
long zoom range (26-676mm 26.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Travel photography with Samsung HZ50W
73
features touch to focus
good resolution (16MP)
flash built-in
display isn't selfie friendly
58
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
great reach (676mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography details
Samsung HZ50W Landscape photography details
79
focusing manually
switch lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
51
you can focus manually
really wide (26mm)
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
MP count decent (14MP)
exports RAW formats
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lack of Timelapse recording
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging information
Samsung HZ50W Vlogging information
35
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detection focus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
24
really wide (26mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone socket
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung HZ50W
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IISamsung HZ50W
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Samsung HZ50W
Otherwise known as - WB5500
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Small Sensor Superzoom
Introduced 2015-08-25 2010-05-03
Physical type SLR-style mirrorless SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4320 x 3240
Highest native ISO 25600 3200
Highest boosted ISO - 6400
Lowest native ISO 200 64
RAW photos
Lowest boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mount type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 26-676mm (26.0x)
Max aperture - f/2.8-5.0
Macro focusing range - 10cm
Amount of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Type of screen Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60 secs 16 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO 100) 5.60 m
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG H.264
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 390g (0.86 lb) 426g (0.94 lb)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light rating 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 photos -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SC/SDHC, Internal
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $499 $250