Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62


70 Imaging
36 Features
44 Overall
39
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-676mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 426g - 116 x 83 x 91mm
- Released May 2010
- Alternate Name is WB5500

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Overview
Here, we will be reviewing the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung HZ50W, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the HZ50W (14MP) is relatively close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and HZ50W (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.

The E-M10 II was launched 5 years later than the HZ50W and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung HZ50W being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting into a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the E-M10 II matches up against the HZ50W in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Samsung HZ50W. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Samsung HZ50W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung HZ50W
E-M10 II | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2015 | ![]() | May 2010 | Fresher by 65 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper screen (+810k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ50W over the Olympus E-M10 II
HZ50W | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung HZ50W
E-M10 II | HZ50W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very precise focusing | ||
Screen size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys exterior dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung HZ50W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") with a weight of 426 grams (0.94 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung HZ50W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 II and the HZ50W.

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and HZ50W is 82 and 70 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing merely by looking through specifications. The visual below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and HZ50W.
Plainly, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II provides a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung HZ50W Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung HZ50W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung HZ50W |
Otherwise known as | - | WB5500 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2010-05-03 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 26-676mm (26.0x) |
Max aperture | - | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing range | - | 10cm |
Amount of lenses | 107 | - |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 16 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 5.60 m |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 426g (0.94 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 116 x 83 x 91mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $499 | $250 |