Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX mini
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
93 Imaging
52 Features
68 Overall
58
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX mini Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20.5MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Raise to 25600)
- 1/16000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX-M Mount
- 196g - 110 x 62 x 23mm
- Launched March 2014
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX mini Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX mini, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a noticeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and NX mini (20.5MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and NX mini (1") use different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe E-M10 II was launched 18 months after the NX mini making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX mini being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the E-M10 II scores against the NX mini in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX mini Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Samsung NX mini. The complete galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Samsung NX mini Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung NX mini
E-M10 II | NX mini | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | March 2014 | More modern by 18 months | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 461k | Crisper display (+579k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX mini over the Olympus E-M10 II
NX mini | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX mini
E-M10 II | NX mini | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX mini Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung NX mini has measurements of 110mm x 62mm x 23mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 196 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX mini in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 II and the NX mini.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and NX mini is 82 and 93 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX mini Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by seeing specifications. The image underneath will give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and NX mini.
To sum up, the two cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Samsung NX mini will provide extra detail utilizing its extra 4.5MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II should have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX mini Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX mini Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX mini | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX mini |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2014-03-19 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20.5MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 160 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX-M |
Total lenses | 107 | 2 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 1,040 thousand dot | 461 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT-LCD (180 degree tilt) |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Smart Flash, auto, auto + redeye reduction, fill-in, fill-in + redeye reduction, 1st curtain, 2nd curtain |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/200 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 (all 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) | 196 grams (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 110 x 62 x 23mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 650 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $499 | $530 |