Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX100
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
88 Imaging
55 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1280 x 720 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 282g - 120 x 71 x 35mm
- Revealed September 2010
- Updated by Samsung NX200
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX100 Overview
On this page, we will be contrasting the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung NX100, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the NX100 (15MP) is pretty well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and NX100 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe E-M10 II was announced 5 years later than the NX100 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a full comparison, here is a short view of how the E-M10 II scores against the NX100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX100 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Samsung NX100. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Samsung NX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung NX100
E-M10 II | NX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | September 2010 | More recent by 61 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 614k | Sharper screen (+426k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX100 over the Olympus E-M10 II
NX100 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX100
E-M10 II | NX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focus | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX100 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with outside measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung NX100 has dimensions of 120mm x 71mm x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") along with a weight of 282 grams (0.62 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung NX100 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the E-M10 II vs the NX100.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and NX100 is 82 and 88 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX100 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at a spec sheet. The graphic here may offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and NX100.
As you can see, each of the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Olympus E-M10 II will give greater detail with its extra 1 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II should have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX100 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX100 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2010-09-14 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | DRIMe Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.4 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 365.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Available lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 1,040k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | - | VGA AMOLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 282g (0.62 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 120 x 71 x 35mm (4.7" x 2.8" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | 62 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 22.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 10.7 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 563 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 420 images |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $499 | $386 |