Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX2000
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Succeeded the Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Announced November 2013
- Replaced the Samsung NX1100
- Renewed by Samsung NX3000
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung NX2000, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the NX2000 (20MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and NX2000 (APS-C) come with totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe E-M10 II was introduced 22 months later than the NX2000 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the E-M10 II matches up against the NX2000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Samsung NX2000. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung NX2000
E-M10 II | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2015 | November 2013 | More recent by 22 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Olympus E-M10 II
NX2000 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3.7" | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") | |
Display resolution | 1152k | 1040k | Sharper display (+112k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX2000
E-M10 II | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera, you will want to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys exterior measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Samsung NX2000 has dimensions of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II versus Samsung NX2000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II versus the NX2000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and NX2000 is 82 and 89 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements just by researching technical specs. The graphic below will help give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and NX2000.
As you can tell, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II using its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh more challenging and the Samsung NX2000 will provide you with greater detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos much more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX2000 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2013-11-30 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 21 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 228 gr (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 73 | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 340 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $499 | $599 |