Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Introduced November 2013
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX210
- Later Model is Samsung NX500
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the NX300 (20MP) is relatively close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and NX300 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-M10 II was revealed 22 months later than the NX300 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going into a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the NX300 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Samsung NX300. The full galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung NX300
E-M10 II | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | November 2013 | More recent by 22 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 768k | Sharper screen (+272k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus E-M10 II
NX300 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX300
E-M10 II | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
If you're going to lug around your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II has physical dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung NX300 has proportions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") along with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II against the NX300.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and NX300 is 82 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by researching specs. The photograph underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and NX300.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II having a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Samsung NX300 will provide you with greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX300 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2013-11-24 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VII | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Amount of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 768 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 gr (0.86 pounds) | 331 gr (0.73 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | 76 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 12.7 |
DXO Low light score | 842 | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 330 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $499 | $750 |