Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX3000
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62


89 Imaging
63 Features
62 Overall
62
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 230g - 117 x 66 x 39mm
- Launched May 2014
- Succeeded the Samsung NX2000

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX3000 Overview
Below, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX3000, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the NX3000 (20MP) is very similar but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and NX3000 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

The E-M10 II was unveiled 16 months after the NX3000 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX3000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a complete comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the E-M10 II matches up versus the NX3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX3000 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Samsung NX3000. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Samsung NX3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung NX3000
E-M10 II | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | ![]() | May 2014 | Newer by 16 months |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 461k | Crisper display (+579k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX3000 over the Olympus E-M10 II
NX3000 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX3000
E-M10 II | NX3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Tilting | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display sizing |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX3000 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II has got physical measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Samsung NX3000 has measurements of 117mm x 66mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX3000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 II against the NX3000.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and NX3000 is 82 and 89 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX3000 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to see the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading specs. The pic underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-M10 II and NX3000.
All in all, both cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Samsung NX3000 will deliver extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX3000 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX3000 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX3000 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2014-05-26 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 35 |
Cross focus points | - | 1 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Number of lenses | 107 | 32 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 117 x 66 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 pictures | 370 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | B740 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2-30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $499 | $897 |