Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300M
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62
86 Imaging
61 Features
73 Overall
65
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Old Model is Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Below, we are looking at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300M, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the NX300M (20MP) is fairly well matched but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and NX300M (APS-C) use different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M10 II was introduced 2 years later than the NX300M and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a simple overview of how the E-M10 II scores vs the NX300M with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Samsung NX300M. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung NX300M
| E-M10 II | NX300M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2015 | January 2013 | More recent by 33 months | |
| Display resolution | 1040k | 768k | Sharper display (+272k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Olympus E-M10 II
| NX300M | E-M10 II | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimension | 3.3" | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX300M
| E-M10 II | NX300M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II has got outside dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300M has measurements of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") and a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300M in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the NX300M.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and NX300M is 82 and 86 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements merely by reading through specs. The graphic here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and NX300M.
As you can plainly see, both cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II with its tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Samsung NX300M will give more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II should have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX300M | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX300M |
| Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Released | 2015-08-25 | 2013-01-03 |
| Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | DRIMe IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 81 | 247 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
| Total lenses | 107 | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
| Display size | 3" | 3.3" |
| Resolution of display | 1,040k dot | 768k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | - |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 8.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 390g (0.86 lb) | 331g (0.73 lb) |
| Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | 73 | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 photographs | 330 photographs |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | BLS-50 | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail price | $499 | $699 |