Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX500
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
87 Imaging
68 Features
80 Overall
72
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Replaced the Olympus E-M10
- Renewed by Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 28MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 287g - 120 x 64 x 43mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Succeeded the Samsung NX300
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX500 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX500, both Entry-Level Mirrorless digital cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and NX500 (28MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and NX500 (APS-C) use different sensor measurements.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe E-M10 II was introduced 7 months later than the NX500 and they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung NX500 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-M10 II grades against the NX500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX500 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Samsung NX500. The whole galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Samsung NX500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung NX500
E-M10 II | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | February 2015 | More recent by 7 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 1036k | Clearer screen (+4k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX500 over the Olympus E-M10 II
NX500 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung NX500
E-M10 II | NX500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera often, you're going to have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with outer dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Samsung NX500 has proportions of 120mm x 64mm x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 287 grams (0.63 lbs).
Check the Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX500 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you use at the time. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the E-M10 II and the NX500.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and NX500 is 82 and 87 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX500 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very tough to picture the gap between sensor measurements only by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here may offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and NX500.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II with its tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh more difficult and the Samsung NX500 will offer you extra detail using its extra 12MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II should have an advantage in sensor technology.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung NX500 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Samsung NX500 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2015-02-06 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | DRIMe 5 |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 28 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6480 x 4320 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 25600 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 51200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 209 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | Samsung NX |
Total lenses | 107 | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Tilting | Tilting |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 1,036k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Smart flash, auto, auto w/redeye reduction, fill flash, fill w/redeye reduction, 1st-curtain, 2nd-curtain, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 (30p), 4096 x 2160 (24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | H.265 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 287 grams (0.63 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 120 x 64 x 43mm (4.7" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 73 | 87 |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | 24.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | 842 | 1379 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | 370 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 - 30 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $499 | $800 |