Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung SL620

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
77
Overall
62
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Samsung SL620 front
Portability
94
Imaging
34
Features
13
Overall
25

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Launched August 2015
  • Superseded the Olympus E-M10
  • Updated by Olympus E-M10 III
Samsung SL620
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
  • 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
  • Introduced February 2009
  • Other Name is PL65
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung SL620 Overview

On this page, we will be looking at the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung SL620, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There is a crucial difference among the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and SL620 (12MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and SL620 (1/2.3") provide totally different sensor size.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The E-M10 II was released 6 years after the SL620 which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before delving into a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the E-M10 II scores versus the SL620 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Samsung SL620

 E-M10 II SL620 
IntroducedAugust 2015February 2009Newer by 80 months
Manually focus Dial exact focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen dimensions3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kClearer screen (+810k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 SL620 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung SL620

 E-M10 II SL620 
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and size. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys physical dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Samsung SL620 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung SL620 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have during that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the E-M10 II versus the SL620.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung SL620 size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and SL620 is 82 and 94 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung SL620 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions only by looking through technical specs. The picture below will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and SL620.

As you can tell, both the cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field simpler and the Olympus E-M10 II will render greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung SL620 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung SL620 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography information
Samsung SL620 Portrait photography information
71
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides face detection focusing
saves RAW files
26
provides face detection autofocus
focusing manually not possible
manual exposure not possible
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Street photography camera
Samsung SL620 as a Street photography camera
82
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW files
has touch focus
good ISO range (25,600)
47
no articulating screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
more heavy than average in class (168 grams)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Sports photography camera
Samsung SL620 as a Sports photography camera
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
provides tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect AF
17
lack of shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect autofocus
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Travel photography camera
Samsung SL620 as a Travel photography camera
73
has touch focus
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
screen isn't selfie friendly
50
flash built-in
doesn't have Timelapse function
more heavy than average in class (168g)
resolution not great (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Landscape photography camera
Samsung SL620 as a Landscape photography camera
79
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count decent (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
saves RAW files
23
focusing manually not possible
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
screen is small (2.7 inch)
manual exposure not possible
no image stabilization
resolution not great (12MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse function
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus E-M10 II
Vlogging with Samsung SL620
35
touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
provides face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external microphone jack
24
provides face detection autofocus
wide angle not good (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
does not feature selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have external microphone port
more heavy than average in class (168 grams)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-M10 II vs Samsung SL620 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Samsung SL620
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IISamsung SL620
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Samsung SL620
Also referred to as - PL65
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Ultracompact
Launched 2015-08-25 2009-02-17
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 17.3 x 13mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 12MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Highest Possible resolution 4608 x 3456 4000 x 3000
Maximum native ISO 25600 1600
Minimum native ISO 200 80
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Manual focus
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 35-175mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture - f/2.8-5.7
Macro focus distance - 5cm
Number of lenses 107 -
Crop factor 2.1 5.9
Screen
Range of display Tilting Fixed Type
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames per sec -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) 4.60 m
Flash options Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video file format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390 gr (0.86 lb) 168 gr (0.37 lb)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 images -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $499 $200