Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP1x
82 Imaging
53 Features
77 Overall
62


88 Imaging
44 Features
27 Overall
37
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP1x Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Launched August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 5MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 320 x 240 video
- 28mm (F4.0) lens
- 250g - 113 x 60 x 50mm
- Introduced February 2010
- Older Model is Sigma DP1s

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP1x Overview
Lets look a little more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Sigma DP1x, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sigma. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and DP1x (5MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and DP1x (APS-C) come with different sensor measurements.

The E-M10 II was manufactured 5 years later than the DP1x and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP1x being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the DP1x in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP1x Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II & Sigma DP1x. The entire galleries are available at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery & Sigma DP1x Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sigma DP1x
E-M10 II | DP1x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2015 | ![]() | February 2010 | Fresher by 68 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma DP1x over the Olympus E-M10 II
DP1x | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sigma DP1x
E-M10 II | DP1x | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP1x Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry your camera often, you will have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II enjoys physical dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Sigma DP1x has dimensions of 113mm x 60mm x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0") along with a weight of 250 grams (0.55 lbs).
See the Olympus E-M10 II versus Sigma DP1x in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the E-M10 II against the DP1x.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and DP1x is 82 and 88 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP1x Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the contrast in sensor sizing merely by researching specifications. The photograph below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the E-M10 II and DP1x.
To sum up, the two cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II due to its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with extra detail due to its extra 11 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP1x Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP1x Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sigma DP1x | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sigma |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sigma DP1x |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2015-08-25 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 5 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2640 x 1760 |
Max native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/4.0 |
Total lenses | 107 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 320 x 240 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 320x240 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) | 250 grams (0.55 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 113 x 60 x 50mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $499 | $574 |