Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill

Portability
82
Imaging
53
Features
77
Overall
62
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Sigma DP2 Merrill front
Portability
83
Imaging
55
Features
33
Overall
46

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Launched August 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus E-M10
  • Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
Sigma DP2 Merrill
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 50mm (F2.8) lens
  • 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
  • Announced February 2012
  • Superseded the Sigma DP1 Merrill
  • Renewed by Sigma DP3 Merrill
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Olympus E-M10 II versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is fairly comparable but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The E-M10 II was brought out 3 years later than the DP2 Merrill and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M10 II grades versus the DP2 Merrill in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sigma DP2 Merrill

 E-M10 II DP2 Merrill 
AnnouncedAugust 2015February 2012More recent by 44 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1040k920kSharper display (+120k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Olympus E-M10 II

 DP2 Merrill E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sigma DP2 Merrill

 E-M10 II DP2 Merrill 
Manually focus More accurate focusing
Display dimensions3"3"Equal display sizing
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison

When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-M10 II has exterior measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") accompanied by a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Sigma DP2 Merrill has measurements of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") and a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the DP2 Merrill.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill size comparison

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and DP2 Merrill is 82 and 83 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor measurements simply by seeing specs. The photograph below might give you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and DP2 Merrill.

As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II featuring a smaller sensor will make achieving bokeh more challenging and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide more detail having its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more recent E-M10 II will have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography advice
Sigma DP2 Merrill Portrait photography advice
71
you can focus manually
good resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers face detection focusing
exports RAW files
73
manual focus
megapixel count decent (15 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography factors
Sigma DP2 Merrill Street photography factors
82
screen tilts up and down
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW files
features touch to focus
very good ISO range (25,600)
65
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
no moving screen
no image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Sports photography camera
Sigma DP2 Merrill as a Sports photography camera
66
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
offers tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect AF
44
megapixel count decent (15 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
painfully slow continuous shooting (4.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
lack of phase detect AF
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography details
Sigma DP2 Merrill Travel photography details
73
features touch to focus
good resolution (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
display isn't selfie friendly
54
megapixel count decent (15MP)
missing Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Landscape photography information
Sigma DP2 Merrill Landscape photography information
79
you can focus manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
good sized screen (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good resolution (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
very good ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW files
55
manual focus
screen is a decent size (3 inches)
megapixel count decent (15 megapixels)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
exports RAW files
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (50mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
missing Time Lapse mode
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging advice
Sigma DP2 Merrill Vlogging advice
35
built-in touchscreen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
offers face detection focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of external microphone port
22
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
missing external mic port
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Sigma DP2 Merrill
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IISigma DP2 Merrill
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sigma
Model Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Sigma DP2 Merrill
Category Entry-Level Mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Launched 2015-08-25 2012-02-08
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII Dual TRUE II engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 24 x 16mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 384.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 15MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Maximum resolution 4608 x 3456 4704 x 3136
Maximum native ISO 25600 6400
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 81 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 50mm (1x)
Maximum aperture - f/2.8
Number of lenses 107 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,040k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent -
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s -
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s -
Continuous shooting speed 8.0 frames/s 4.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 5.80 m (ISO 100) no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual no built-in flash
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 640x480
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 390g (0.86 pounds) 330g (0.73 pounds)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score 73 not tested
DXO Color Depth score 23.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range score 12.5 not tested
DXO Low light score 842 not tested
Other
Battery life 320 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery model BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $499 $931