Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62c3c/62c3ce44298b85880cf33d759daf3251ff32053c" alt="Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d88a7/d88a7812e71c59a9e4e86f9ed56f4270378edf4e" alt="Sigma SD9 front Sigma SD9 front"
54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Introduced August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Revealed November 2002
- Refreshed by Sigma SD10
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 Overview
On this page, we will be evaluating the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Olympus and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and SD9 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The E-M10 II was brought out 12 years after the SD9 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the E-M10 II grades vs the SD9 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sigma SD9
E-M10 II | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2015 | ![]() | November 2002 | Newer by 156 months |
Screen type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 130k | Sharper screen (+910k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus E-M10 II
SD9 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sigma SD9
E-M10 II | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II comes with external measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Sigma SD9 has proportions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") along with a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with during that time. Here is a front view physical size comparison of the E-M10 II and the SD9.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d44a/7d44a008c98fbec610938f3ce56a6dd8f63915ed" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and SD9 is 82 and 54 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e050f/e050f2b1bd9439892642ce3ae8b8d003534fe129" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very tough to imagine the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specifications. The picture below might offer you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and SD9.
To sum up, both of those cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The E-M10 II featuring a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will render extra detail having its extra 13MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher E-M10 II provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eb6b9/eb6b9442b902b1d02299eebd7e5ccbb4f5b6a771" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 sensor size comparison"
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00c14/00c14e6c0a25f9790cedff99ca80ba771c8899a2" alt="Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sigma SD9 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2015-08-25 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 3MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 400 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | 81 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sigma SA |
Total lenses | 107 | 76 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 1.8" |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 8.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390g (0.86 lbs) | 950g (2.09 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | - |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at release | $499 | $3,001 |