Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A7c
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
78 Imaging
76 Features
88 Overall
80
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A7c Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Superseded the Olympus E-M10
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 51200 (Bump to 204800)
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Sony E Mount
- 509g - 124 x 71 x 60mm
- Announced September 2020
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A7c Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A7c, one is a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and A7c (24MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and A7c (Full frame) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe E-M10 II was unveiled 6 years prior to the A7c which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A7c being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting in to a thorough comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the E-M10 II grades versus the A7c with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A7c Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Sony Alpha A7c. The full galleries are provided at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Sony A7c Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony A7c
E-M10 II | A7c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1040k | 922k | Sharper screen (+118k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony A7c over the Olympus E-M10 II
A7c | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2020 | August 2015 | More modern by 61 months | |
Screen type | Fully articulated | Tilting | Fully Articulating screen | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony A7c
E-M10 II | A7c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurement | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A7c Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II offers physical dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Sony A7c has proportions of 124mm x 71mm x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") along with a weight of 509 grams (1.12 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A7c in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II versus the A7c.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and A7c is 82 and 78 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A7c Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor sizes only by going over specs. The picture underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and A7c.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The E-M10 II using its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony A7c will offer you greater detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged E-M10 II is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A7c Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A7c Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Alpha A7c | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Alpha A7c |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2015-08-25 | 2020-09-14 |
Physical type | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | Full frame |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 35.8 x 23.8mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 852.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 25600 | 51200 |
Highest boosted ISO | - | 204800 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | 50 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 81 | 693 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | Sony E |
Total lenses | 107 | 122 |
Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fully articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 1,040k dots | 922k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dots | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.59x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Highest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/8000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 8.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, XAVC S, MP4, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, XAVC S, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lb) | 509 grams (1.12 lb) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 124 x 71 x 60mm (4.9" x 2.8" x 2.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 73 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 23.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 12.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 842 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photos | 740 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BLS-50 | NP-FZ100 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec; continuous (3 or 5 exposures)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $499 | $1,800 |