Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A200

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
Portability
66
Imaging
49
Features
38
Overall
44

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A200 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Released August 2015
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M10
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 III
Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Launched July 2008
  • Updated by Sony A230
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A200 Overview

Let's take a closer look at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Sony A200, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a big difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and A200 (10MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and A200 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-M10 II was announced 7 years later than the A200 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the E-M10 II matches up against the A200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony A200

 E-M10 II A200 
LaunchedAugust 2015July 2008Fresher by 87 months
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display size3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution1040k230kCrisper display (+810k dot)
Touch friendly display Easily navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 A200 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony A200

 E-M10 II A200 
Manual focus Dial exact focus
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II offers external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) while the Sony A200 has proportions of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).

Examine the Olympus E-M10 II versus Sony A200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the E-M10 II compared to the A200.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A200 size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability score of the E-M10 II and A200 is 82 and 66 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be hard to envision the gap between sensor sizing just by reviewing a spec sheet. The visual below might provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and A200.

Clearly, both of these cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallow DOF more challenging and the Olympus E-M10 II will offer you greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos way more aggressively. The newer E-M10 II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Portrait photography highlights
Sony A200 Portrait photography highlights
72
focusing manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports face detect focus
delivers RAW files
53
has manual focus
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
low resolution (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography info
Sony A200 Street photography info
83
tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
has focus by touch
good ISO range (25,600)
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography features
Sony A200 Sports photography features
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports tracking focus
lack of phase detect auto focus
49
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect AF
no liveview
low frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
low resolution (10MP)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Travel photography advice
Sony A200 Travel photography advice
73
has focus by touch
MP count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
does not feature selfie friendly display
46
built-in flash
lack of Time Lapse mode
low resolution (10 megapixels)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Landscape photography with Sony A200
79
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
MP count good (16MP)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
good ISO range (25,600)
delivers RAW files
53
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is nice (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inch)
no liveview
low resolution (10 megapixels)
lack of Time Lapse mode
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging highlights
Sony A200 Vlogging highlights
35
touchscreen capability
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
supports face detect focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not feature selfie friendly display
lack of microphone jack
9
no video shooting
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Sony A200
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IISony Alpha DSLR-A200
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2015-08-25 2008-07-17
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Min boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Tracking autofocus
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 107 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Display type Tilting Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 2.7"
Display resolution 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.55x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 8.0fps 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO 100) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 390g (0.86 lbs) 572g (1.26 lbs)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 73 63
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 11.3
DXO Low light rating 842 521
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Storage slots 1 1
Retail price $499 $100