Clicky

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300

Portability
82
Imaging
54
Features
77
Overall
63
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A300 front
Portability
64
Imaging
49
Features
45
Overall
47

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300 Key Specs

Olympus E-M10 II
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
  • Launched August 2015
  • Older Model is Olympus E-M10
  • Refreshed by Olympus E-M10 III
Sony A300
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 632g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Announced January 2008
  • Renewed by Sony A330
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300 Overview

Here is a thorough overview of the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300, former being a Entry-Level Mirrorless while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the E-M10 II (16MP) and A300 (10MP) and the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and A300 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The E-M10 II was released 7 years later than the A300 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A300 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving into a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the E-M10 II matches up vs the A300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony A300

 E-M10 II A300 
AnnouncedAugust 2015January 2008Fresher by 93 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1040k230kSharper screen (+810k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Sony A300 over the Olympus E-M10 II

 A300 E-M10 II 

Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony A300

 E-M10 II A300 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Screen typeTiltingTiltingTilting screen
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-M10 II offers external measurements of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") along with a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) and the Sony A300 has dimensions of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") along with a weight of 632 grams (1.39 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the E-M10 II versus the A300.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability grade of the E-M10 II and A300 is 82 and 64 respectively.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300 Sensor Comparison

Usually, it is very difficult to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by looking at technical specs. The graphic here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-M10 II and A300.

As you have seen, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-M10 II due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 II will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The younger E-M10 II is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Portrait photography with Sony A300
72
focusing manually
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focusing
supports RAW files
59
focusing manually
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
low resolution sensor (10MP)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Street photography advice
Sony A300 Street photography advice
83
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
supports RAW files
features touch focus
good high ISO (25,600)
74
has a tilting screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Sports photography factors
Sony A300 Sports photography factors
67
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
doesn't have phase detect AF
54
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
comes with phase detect AF
max fps low (3.0 fps)
low resolution sensor (10 megapixels)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II as a Travel photography camera
Sony A300 as a Travel photography camera
73
features touch focus
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
has built in flash
screen isn't selfie friendly
45
has built in flash
missing Time Lapse recording
low resolution sensor (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus E-M10 II
Landscape photography with Sony A300
79
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
decent sensor resolution (16MP)
decent sensor size (Four Thirds)
good high ISO (25,600)
supports RAW files
57
focusing manually
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inches)
low resolution sensor (10MP)
missing Time Lapse recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-M10 II Vlogging features
Sony A300 Vlogging features
35
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
screen isn't selfie friendly
missing external mic jack
9
no video
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-M10 II and Sony A300
 Olympus OM-D E-M10 IISony Alpha DSLR-A300
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus OM-D E-M10 II Sony Alpha DSLR-A300
Class Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level DSLR
Launched 2015-08-25 2008-01-30
Body design SLR-style mirrorless Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip TruePic VII -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds APS-C
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 -
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 25600 3200
Min native ISO 200 100
RAW format
Min enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 81 9
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds Sony/Minolta Alpha
Amount of lenses 107 143
Crop factor 2.1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3 inches 2.7 inches
Screen resolution 1,040 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dot -
Viewfinder coverage 100% 95%
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.49x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60s 30s
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Continuous shutter speed 8.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 5.80 m (ISO 100) 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 390 grams (0.86 lb) 632 grams (1.39 lb)
Physical dimensions 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating 73 64
DXO Color Depth rating 23.1 22.5
DXO Dynamic range rating 12.5 11.4
DXO Low light rating 842 538
Other
Battery life 320 shots -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID BLS-50 -
Self timer Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Storage slots One One
Cost at release $499 $0