Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A390
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Released August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Successor is Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Launched July 2010
- Earlier Model is Sony A380
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A390 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Olympus E-M10 II versus Sony A390, one being a Entry-Level Mirrorless and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the E-M10 II (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is fairly close but the E-M10 II (Four Thirds) and A390 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe E-M10 II was brought out 5 years later than the A390 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go through a thorough comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-M10 II scores vs the A390 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A390 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus OM-D E-M10 II and Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus E-M10 II Gallery and Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Sony A390
E-M10 II | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2015 | July 2010 | More recent by 62 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 230k | Sharper display (+810k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus E-M10 II
A390 | E-M10 II |
---|
Common features in the Olympus E-M10 II and Sony A390
E-M10 II | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting | Tilting display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus E-M10 II has got external dimensions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") having a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has proportions of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") accompanied by a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check out the Olympus E-M10 II versus Sony A390 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the E-M10 II against the A390.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the E-M10 II and A390 is 82 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very difficult to visualise the gap in sensor measurements merely by viewing technical specs. The visual below will give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-M10 II and A390.
As you can tell, both of those cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The E-M10 II due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Olympus E-M10 II will provide you with greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern E-M10 II will have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus E-M10 II vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Category | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Released | 2015-08-25 | 2010-07-28 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VII | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Four Thirds | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 224.9mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 25600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Min enhanced ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 81 | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Micro Four Thirds | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Available lenses | 107 | 143 |
Crop factor | 2.1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 1,040 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 95% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 8.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.80 m (ISO 100) | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) | 549 grams (1.21 lbs) |
Dimensions | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 73 | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 23.1 | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 12.5 | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | 842 | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 320 photographs | 230 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BLS-50 | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $499 | $500 |